| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 |
61. TomB, you guys forgot this Mining Rigs - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Jeff Anderson on 11/06/2007 01:48:01 From previous posts in this forum Miners And Industrialists are getting no love in Rev 2, there were plans but they were dumped in favor of more PVP changes. Miners supply the ore that the Indu...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.11 01:48:00
|
62. No GSC in hauler cargoholds in carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Just so i understand what the issue is here ... Currently on tranq you can store for example an Iteron V full of GSC's in the Carriers Ship Maintainance Bay, but not in a pos's Ship Maintainance Array. All ships in the maintainance array have to ...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.11 01:40:00
|
63. Pos Bug? or undocumented change? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
At 335km they locked and fire very rarely hitting, at 334km they hit almost all the time doing damage despite the yellow symbol.
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.08 21:51:00
|
64. Pos Bug? or undocumented change? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Jeff Anderson on 08/06/2007 12:35:41 Edited by: Jeff Anderson on 08/06/2007 12:35:25 with the tower at 335km, the nearest module was 286km away with the closest one that targeted me being 329km away. Edit: I should also point o...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.08 12:33:00
|
65. Pos Bug? or undocumented change? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Pos tower "activation proximity" says 250km, but on sisi I was able to repeatedly get a pos to target me at 335km (come in from 380km out at 100m/s to pin point when it was targeting me). Has the range of pos's been increased or is this an artifac...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.08 12:17:00
|
66. When are belts going to the exploration thingy - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Macrominers are making it harder to find a decent place to mine and I know from dev blogs that belts will be moving to the exploration thingy to try to combat it. I would just like to know some sort of time line on it please?
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.07 03:02:00
|
67. Macrominers get foothold in orshed constellation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Jeff Anderson on 07/06/2007 02:24:53 Originally by: Red Harvest Erm, planned for Rev 2.0 which goes live soonish. Um, nope, rev 2 still has normal belts, only complexes are hidden.
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.07 02:25:00
|
68. Macrominers get foothold in orshed constellation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
After being chased out by suicide gangs and a long absence it appears macrominers have returned. These macrominers have been around for along time so no point reporting them but all are from the same noob corp. This area has been well managed by t...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.07 02:11:00
|
69. FPS Counter Improoves FPS? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Jeff Anderson on 03/06/2007 22:38:04 While trying to determine the source of some lag I am currently getting, I brought up the FPS counter, lag went away. So I removed the FPS counter, lag returned, WTF!? I tried several times in d...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.06.03 22:37:00
|
70. Did the ORE Capital Ship get sidelined? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Without industrialists there would be no ships for the pvp'ers, so please CCP give some love to those who support the PVPers.
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.05.31 11:23:00
|
71. Sexism - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
On the internet, Men are men, Women are Men, and Girls are FBI Agents
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.05.30 12:19:00
|
72. that was a serious thread btw - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Not knowing the politics within goon I'm a little confused. Why not just kick out the corp who caused the PR problem in the 1st place and keep going on with business as usual.
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.05.30 11:27:00
|
73. Suggestion: Dynamic Sec Status - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
what could make this game interesting is dynamic security status through eve except training areas. Have systems track traffic plus player ships destroyed in that system within a 24 hour period. If ships destroyed was 10% (for example) of traffic...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.05.30 03:34:00
|
74. Starbase Warfare - Testing Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Clarification please: Are pos guns now to be anchored only outside the forcefield, or is there new pos guns that can only be anchored outside the forcefield.
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.05.27 11:52:00
|
75. New Staff, New Blog, New Information on Encounters! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
1 possable solution: Remove the probes and have theprobe skills effect the directional scanner. I see is like possably like this: the directional scanner has a scanning beam with a fixed strength (improved by skills). for 360 deg scan, that beam...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.04.28 15:40:00
|
76. The voice of dissapointment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When I heard about the 30day free trial of the embeded voice coms I thought I would try it. In doing so, 2 issues surfaces. 1) When assigning a key in eve you must use shift/ctrl/alt with it. Use the middle mouse I hear you say? Well I have one o...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.03.21 00:54:00
|
77. Australian / NZ / EU / US players Wanted, VTIL - ASCN Members - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Come shoot something
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.03.17 02:09:00
|
78. RA press release concerning Smash announcement. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
From the front lines: I was in 77S beating up LV and killing LV POS's. We were making preperations to claim sov of the system when the word comes down that someone in SMASH had scammed RA and RA wanted smash out. We retreated but not without casu...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.03.17 02:00:00
|
79. Revelations 1.3 Patch Deployment: Tues, 30 January from 0800-1200 GMT - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Patch Note: Freighters now have a sensor strength attribute to counter target jamming modules. Question: Why are freighters even getting this when they can't fit any modules so jamming them is pointless anyways?
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2007.01.26 23:39:00
|
80. New area speculation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Curious as to who would grab what I did a little digging and come up with the following: Red Alliance will control VU-WU2, 6HL8-L and half of 7-KXBJ as it will be a contested region. This is because they control 7 of the 9 access points to those ...
- by Jeff Anderson - at 2006.11.07 09:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |